Kia XCeed 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 242 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Kia XCeed is more dynamic to drive. Kia XCeed engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 77 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Kia XCeed reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Kia XCeed is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia XCeed consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia XCeed could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia XCeed consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia XCeed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia XCeed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Kia XCeed is larger, but lower. Kia XCeed and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1378 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Kia XCeed has 4 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia XCeed is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia XCeed has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |