Kia Venga 2015 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Venga is more dynamic to drive. Kia Venga engine produces 35 HP more power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. Thanks to more power Kia Venga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 3.4 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Venga consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Venga could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo MiTo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Venga is larger. Kia Venga is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Kia Venga is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage capacity. Kia Venga has 170 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 0.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Kia Venga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`810 kg | 1`630 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |