Kia Venga 2015 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Kia Venga is more dynamic to drive. Kia Venga engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Kia Venga reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Venga consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Venga could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Venga consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Venga 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Kia Venga is larger. Kia Venga is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Venga is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1486 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage capacity. Kia Venga has 160 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Venga (by 536 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Kia Venga can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Kia Venga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Kia Venga, so Kia Venga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |