Kia Venga 2015 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Kia Venga and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Kia Venga torque is 20 NM more than Renault Clio. Kia Venga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 3.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Venga consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Venga could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Hyundai ix20 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Venga engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Venga is larger. Kia Venga is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Venga is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage capacity. Kia Venga has 140 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Kia Venga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Kia Venga, so Kia Venga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Renault Clio has
| |