Kia Venga 2009 vs Nissan Note 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Kia Venga and Nissan Note have the same engine power, but Kia Venga torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Note. Kia Venga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Venga consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Venga could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Venga consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Hyundai ix20 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Venga engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Note 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Note 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
| Kia Venga is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Venga is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Venga has 160 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Kia Venga can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia Venga has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Note, so Kia Venga quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Nissan Note has
| |