Kia Venga 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Kia Venga engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Kia Venga reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Venga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Venga consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Kia Venga over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Venga consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Kia Venga is smaller. Kia Venga is 23 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Venga is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Kia Venga has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Venga has 21 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Venga has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |