Kia Venga 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Kia Venga engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Kia Venga reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Venga consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Venga could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Venga consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Kia Venga is smaller. Kia Venga is 23 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Venga is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
| Kia Venga has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Venga has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |