Kia Venga 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 260 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 17.4 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.0 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Kia Venga petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Kia Venga equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Kia Venga is smaller. Kia Venga is 27 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Kia Venga has 110 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Venga is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`767 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Venga has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |