Kia Stinger 2017 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 370 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Stinger is more dynamic to drive. Kia Stinger engine produces 210 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 270 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.3 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Stinger consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Stinger consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Kia Stinger is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Stinger is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1114 litres | 1356 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Kia Stinger has 52 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 242 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Kia Stinger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Stinger scores higher in safety tests. The Kia Stinger scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |