Kia Stinger 2017 vs Opel Insignia 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 370 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Stinger is more dynamic to drive. Kia Stinger engine produces 200 HP more power than Opel Insignia, whereas torque is 250 NM more than Opel Insignia. Thanks to more power Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.3 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Insignia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Stinger consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Insignia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Stinger consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Insignia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Insignia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Insignia) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
| Kia Stinger is 1 cm shorter than the Opel Insignia, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Stinger is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1114 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Opel Insignia has more luggage space. Kia Stinger has 124 litres less trunk space than the Opel Insignia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Insignia (by 356 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Insignia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Kia Stinger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Opel Insignia has
| |