Kia Stinger 2017 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Stinger engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo V60, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Stinger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Stinger consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia Stinger is larger, but lower. Kia Stinger is 20 cm longer than the Volvo V60, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Stinger is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1114 litres | 1241 litres | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Kia Stinger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V60 (by 127 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`325 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`801 kg | 1`725 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 524 kg | 555 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |