Kia Stinger 2017 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Kia Stinger is more dynamic to drive. Kia Stinger engine produces 50 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo V90. Thanks to more power Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Stinger consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Stinger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Volvo V90 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia Stinger is smaller. Kia Stinger is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Stinger is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1114 litres | 1526 litres | |
|
Volvo V90 has more luggage space. Kia Stinger has 154 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V90 (by 412 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo V90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |