Kia Stinger 2017 vs Volvo V60 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Stinger engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Stinger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Stinger consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V60) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia Stinger is larger, but lower. Kia Stinger is 20 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Stinger is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1114 litres | 1241 litres | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Kia Stinger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V60 (by 127 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Kia Stinger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`656 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 544 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |