Kia Stinger 2017 vs Audi A5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Kia Stinger is more dynamic to drive. Kia Stinger engine produces 10 HP more power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Audi A5. Thanks to more power Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Stinger consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Stinger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q5, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Kia Stinger is larger. Kia Stinger is 10 cm longer than the Audi A5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Stinger is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1114 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Stinger has 74 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. This could mean that the Kia Stinger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Kia Stinger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Audi A5 has
| |