Kia Stinger 2019 vs Volvo V90 2016

 
Kia Stinger
2019 -
Volvo V90
2016 - 2020
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 197 HP190 HP
Torque: n/a NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds8.9 seconds
Kia Stinger engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo V90.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.86.9
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Stinger consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.94 m
Width: 1.87 m1.89 m
Height: 1.40 m1.48 m
Kia Stinger is smaller.
Kia Stinger is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Stinger is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 406 litres560 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1526 litres
Volvo V90 has more luggage space.
Kia Stinger has 154 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V90.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`300
Safety:
The Volvo V90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 26 00021 200
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo V90 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • better safety assist technologies
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv