Kia Stinger 2017 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006

 
Kia Stinger
2017 - 2018
Chevrolet Epica
2006 - 2010
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 255 HP141 HP
Torque: 353 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 seconds9.9 seconds
Kia Stinger is more dynamic to drive.
Kia Stinger engine produces 114 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 158 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Thanks to more power Kia Stinger reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.38.2
Kia Stinger consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Stinger could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1030 km on highway
Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Epica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Stinger) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Epica engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years8 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Chevrolet Epica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.80 m
Width: 1.87 m1.81 m
Height: 1.40 m1.45 m
Kia Stinger is larger, but lower.
Kia Stinger is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 6 cm wider, while the height of Kia Stinger is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 406 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1114 litresno data
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Kia Stinger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica.
Gross weight: 2`185 kg1`985 kg
Net weight:1`642 kg1`500 kg
Load capacity:543 kg485 kg
Kia Stinger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Chevrolet Epica. Therefore, Kia Stinger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 20 4002400
Pros and Cons: Kia Stinger has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Chevrolet Epica has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv