Kia Stinger 2017 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Kia Stinger is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Epica has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Kia Stinger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Epica can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.3 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 - 370 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 510 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.9 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.6 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Kia Stinger petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. On average, Kia Stinger equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Stinger is larger, but lower. Kia Stinger is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 6 cm wider, while the height of Kia Stinger is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1114 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Stinger has 74 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Kia Stinger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Stinger is 0.9 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica, which means Kia Stinger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`257 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Stinger has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |