Kia Sportage 2008 vs Ford Kuga 2008

 
Kia Sportage
2008 - 2010
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP136 HP
Torque: 304 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.8 seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Sportage engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 16 NM less than Ford Kuga. Despite the higher power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.05.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 255 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1280 km on highway
670 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Kia Sportage 2008 2.0 engine: The Hyundai/Kia 2.0 CRDi engine with the D4EA code is a cast-iron diesel unit introduced in the early 2000s. It is known for solid durability and, when properly maintained, can often reach 300,000–400,000 km. The engine appeared in several versions over the years. Early variants produced around 112 hp with a conventional ...  More about Kia Sportage 2008 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.44 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.70 m1.68 m
Kia Sportage is smaller, but slightly higher.
Kia Sportage is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 667 litres410 litres
Kia Sportage has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight: 2`170 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Ford Kuga has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 40005400
Pros and Cons: Kia Sportage has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Kuga has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv