Kia Sportage 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 382 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sportage engine produces 44 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Sportage engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Kia Sportage is 8 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 564 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sportage has 8 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.58 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 1.22 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Kia Sportage has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Kia Sportage quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |