Kia Sportage 2010 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 382 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sportage engine produces 48 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Kia Sportage and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 564 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage capacity. Kia Sportage has 236 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.58 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.22 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Sportage scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Compass is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia Sportage scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |