Kia Sportage 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 39 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |