Kia Sportage 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2013

 
Kia Sportage
2014 - 2015
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP163 HP
Torque: 320 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds10.4 seconds
Kia Sportage engine produces 27 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Kuga. Despite less power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km8.0 l/100km
By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 150 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Sportage consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1090 km on highway
740 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.52 m
Width: no data1.84 m
Height: no data1.70 m
Trunk capacity: no data456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1568 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`250
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Ford Kuga has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 40012 200
Pros and Cons: Kia Sportage has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv