Kia Sportage 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Kia Sportage over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1470 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Kia Sportage is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`425 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 575 kg | 630 kg | |
| Kia Sportage load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |