Kia Sportage 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 41 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2016 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2016 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Kia Sportage is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sportage has 356 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia Sportage has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Kia Sportage, so Kia Sportage quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |