Kia Sportage 2010 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 255 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Kia Sportage engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 56 litres | |
890 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Kia Sportage is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 564 litres | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1353 litres | 1620 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sportage has 59 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 267 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`035 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8000 | 8800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |