Kia Sportage 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sportage engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Sportage engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is larger. Kia Sportage is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 564 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1353 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Kia Sportage has 154 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |