Kia Sportage 1999 vs Subaru Forester 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 75 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 10 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.9 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.58 m | |
| Kia Sportage is 14 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 373 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Forester has
| |