Kia Sportage 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 107 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 161 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 13.8 | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Kia Sportage over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 373 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Kia Sportage can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |