Kia Sportage 1999 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 157 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 82 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 12.4 | |
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Kia Sportage over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.72 m | |
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 373 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |