Kia Sportage 1999 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 22 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 373 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |