Kia Sportage 1997 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Kia Sportage) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 21.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 13 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 9.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.2 | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Kia Sportage over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 29 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 347 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
640 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Kia Sportage has 28 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Kia Sportage can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |