Kia Sportage 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 83 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 87 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Kia Sportage over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.85 m | |
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2220 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |