Kia Sportage 1997 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 83 HP | 97 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.5 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 14 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sportage consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 14 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 347 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
640 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |