Kia Sportage 2015 vs BMW X1 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sportage engine produces 5 HP less power than BMW X1, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sportage consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sportage could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sportage consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is larger. Kia Sportage is 4 cm longer than the BMW X1, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 466 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Sportage has 39 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. This could mean that the Kia Sportage uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
BMW X1 has
| |