Kia Sportage 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 175 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 184 - 305 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 12 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 10.0 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
Kia Sportage petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Kia Sportage equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Kia Sportage is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 667 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | 1841 litres | |
Kia Sportage has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sportage has 257 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sportage (by 45 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`210 | ~ 2`009 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |