Kia Sportage 2010 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 184 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 382 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.1 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.2 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
Kia Sportage petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Kia Sportage equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Kia Sportage is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 740 litres | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1547 litres | 1620 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sportage has 235 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 73 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`064 | ~ 2`045 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 8800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |