Kia Sportage 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 164 - 320 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.3 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.5 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Kia Sportage petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Kia Sportage equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
| Kia Sportage is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 564 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sportage has 108 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`952 | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |