Kia Sportage 1999 vs Suzuki Vitara 1988

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Sportage
1999 - 2006
Suzuki Vitara
1988 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.01.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 83 - 128 HP71 - 136 HP
Torque: 157 - 195 NM127 - 216 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 - 20.5 seconds12.5 - 19.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.1 - 11.87.8 - 10.9
Kia Sportage petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Vitara. On average, Kia Sportage equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.02 m
Width: 1.76 m1.67 m
Height: 1.65 m1.70 m
Kia Sportage is larger, but lower.
Kia Sportage is 34 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 9 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sportage is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 640 litres580 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2220 litres1300 litres
Kia Sportage has more luggage capacity.
Kia Sportage has 60 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sportage (by 920 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`955~ 1`844
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 22002600
Pros and Cons: Kia Sportage has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Suzuki Vitara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv