Kia Sportage 1994 vs Mercedes ML 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.7 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 63 - 128 HP | 163 - 347 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 195 NM | 310 - 560 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 - 21.7 seconds | 6.7 - 12.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 12.7 | 9.4 - 14.8 | |
Kia Sportage petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Kia Sportage equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 35 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 14 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
640 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`908 | ~ 3`481 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
| |