Kia Sorento 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sorento and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Kia Sorento torque is 20 NM less than Honda CR-V. Kia Sorento reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sorento consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sorento could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sorento consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Kia Sorento is 7 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sorento is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 890 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Sorento has 365 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sorento (by 948 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Kia Sorento can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sorento has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |