Kia Sorento 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sorento engine produces 16 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 5 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Kia Sorento reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.4 | |
| Kia Sorento consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sorento could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sorento might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Kia Sorento is larger. Kia Sorento is 14 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sorento is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Sorento has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Kia Sorento uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Kia Sorento can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sorento has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |