Kia Sorento 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 421 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Sorento is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sorento engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Kia Sorento reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sorento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sorento consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Kia Sorento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sorento consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 4007, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sorento might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Kia Sorento is larger. Kia Sorento is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sorento is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Sorento has 259 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This could mean that the Kia Sorento uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |