Kia Sorento 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 441 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Sorento is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sorento engine produces 50 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 121 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Kia Sorento reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Sorento consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Kia Sorento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Sorento consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Kia Sorento is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Sorento is 17 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sorento is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 142 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 142 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 660 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1662 litres | 1773 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Kia Sorento has more luggage space (by 181 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Kia Sorento can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`620 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 31 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |