Kia Sorento 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 441 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Kia Sorento is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sorento engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Kia Sorento reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sorento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Sorento consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Kia Sorento over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Sorento consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Kia Sorento is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Sorento is 17 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sorento is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 142 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 142 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 660 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1662 litres | 1773 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Kia Sorento has more luggage space (by 181 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`590 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 31 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |