Kia Sorento 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 197 HP | 150 - 173 HP | |
Torque: | 225 - 436 NM | 233 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 11.5 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.8 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
Kia Sorento petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Kia Sorento equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
Kia Sorento is larger. Kia Sorento is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sorento is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 603 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1773 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Sorento has 88 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Kia Sorento uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Kia Sorento can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`510 | ~ 2`146 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |