Kia Sorento 2012 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.2 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 197 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 436 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 11.5 seconds | 9.2 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.8 | 6.2 - 10.5 | |
|
Kia Sorento petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. On average, Kia Sorento equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sorento is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1598 litres | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage capacity. Kia Sorento has 38 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sorento is 1.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Kia Sorento can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`510 | ~ 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sorento has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |