Kia Shuma 1998 vs Kia Sephia 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 111 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 152 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Kia Shuma engine produces 31 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Kia Sephia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.4 | |
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Shuma consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Shuma could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Kia Sephia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Kia Shuma is larger. Kia Shuma is 23 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Sephia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |