Kia Shuma 1998 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Kia Shuma engine produces 28 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Kia Shuma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Shuma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Kia Shuma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Shuma consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Kia Shuma is smaller, but higher. Kia Shuma is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Shuma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Kia Shuma has 132 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 510 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |