Kia Shuma 1998 vs Skoda Octavia 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Shuma is more dynamic to drive. Kia Shuma engine produces 13 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Kia Shuma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.6 | |
| Kia Shuma consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Shuma could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Shuma is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Shuma is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 1330 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Kia Shuma has 200 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 550 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |