Kia Shuma 2001 vs Rover 45 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Shuma engine produces 3 HP less power than Rover 45, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Rover 45. Due to the lower power, Kia Shuma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.7 | |
|
The Rover 45 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Shuma consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Shuma could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Rover 45 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 45 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Carens, Kia Sephia, Kia Clarus | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 75, Rover 25 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Shuma might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Kia Shuma is larger. Kia Shuma is 17 cm longer than the Rover 45, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Shuma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1207 litres | 717 litres | |
|
Kia Shuma has more luggage capacity. Kia Shuma has 60 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Shuma is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 45, which means Kia Shuma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Shuma has
|
Rover 45 has
| |